Pingdom Check
03/31/2025 | 8:00 AM

Our survey on the impact of AI on travelers

Survey objective

We're exploring how AI-generated and manipulated images, misleading travel listings and messaging is impacting real travelers.

Survey scope

Audience: adults 18+

Markets: USA, France, Denmark, and Germany*

Sample: 1,000 per country

UK results

*We conducted a separate survey in the UK, with results summarized below.

---

By the way – these photos...This is Svartifoss waterfall in South Iceland. It's real.

The banner photo is real. It's Vestrahorn mountain on Iceland's southeast coast.

Summary of results

Seeing isn’t always believing

One in three travelers (33%) have felt misled by a travel listing, whether due to overly edited imagery, missing or inaccurate descriptions (36%), or false reviews (27%). Danish consumers in particular are the most attuned to these misrepresentations. Despite this, more than half (54%) still turn to photos when making booking decisions, with Danes again leading the charge.

The new trust triad

When assessing the legitimacy of a destination, travelers place their faith in a trio of sources: official websites (60%), peer reviews (57%), and word-of-mouth recommendations. In contrast, AI-generated content is sparking unease.

A crisis of confidence in AI

A staggering 78% of consumers report concerns about fake or AI-generated reviews, with 58% saying such content makes it harder to trust what they see online. Only 19% would book a destination if the main images appeared AI-generated – though nearly half (44%) say they’d reconsider based on strong reviews.

Red flags and dealbreakers

Beyond high prices, travelers are most turned off by negative or inconsistent reviews (51%), AI-generated or “too good to be true” listings (48%), and photos that feel overly staged or unrealistic (42%).

Surprises, both good and bad

While one in five consumers (21%) have disputed a booking that didn’t live up to its promise, more than two-thirds (68%) have had the opposite experience – delighted to find that reality exceeded expectations.

Authenticity is the real luxury

What makes a destination feel genuinely “real”? For most, it’s tasting local cuisine (59%), exploring cultural landmarks (51%), browsing local markets (47%), and connecting with the region’s history and traditions (42%).

Cautious curiosity toward AI in travel planning

Though headlines tout the promise of AI in travel, just 12% of consumers currently use it to plan their trips. And nearly half (47%) believe destinations shouldn’t be allowed to use AI to enhance their tourism marketing at all.

The questionnaire

Results from our UK survey

We conducted a separate survey in the UK, and learnt the following:

  • One in five holidaymakers have booked a trip based on a review that was misleading, exaggerated.
  • Three in 10 of those deceived said the location wasn’t up to scratch compared to what others had described.
  • 24% believe the images they’d seen had been artificially enhanced or even generated by AI.
  • As a result, 29% complained to the review platform, while 28% took it up with the hotel.
  • The study also found 85% of travellers believe they’re going to increase their levels of caution when booking in the future.
  • 65% think they have seen a travel photo that looked ‘too good to be real’.
  • And only 43% would be generally confident they could spot an AI-generated travel image, from a real one.
  • As a result, 58% rely most on word-of-mouth from friends or family when it comes to travel reviews.
  • Just 11% trust those found on social media.
  • Of those who have spotted a review they believed was fake or AI generated, 30% have reported it.
  • And as many as 70% would be less likely to book a trip through a platform if they suspected it might be home to untrustworthy reviews.